Thank you, I was thinking the same

I hope it is Argentina -- we don't need more embarrassment to add the SC's worst list.

I guess the old adage is true-you can't fix stupid!

We already have a gov. that makes reallity shows look serious

What about the fact that he had to go to court to explain his use of taxpayer dollars to fund that affair? On dozens of charges, and that he had to pay major fines for? Do you care about that?

to say that sanford is the best governor we ever had, is alittle off line. We have had better, believe me. Of course what we have now is much worse. But i tend to forget this is SC with all their hatred toward the Democratic Party. Johnson is no longer our president. Isnt this where it all began when he made equal rights for everyone.

they already have and they are driving the country over the clift...

They're already here - Sanford, and anyone who would vote for him!

You're kidding, right? He did across the board cuts instead of targeting pork projects. The kind of cuts that have our roads crumbling, our population sicker, hungrier and less educated while giving tax breaks to the whealthy. Sounds like HE was sending us into a third world country.

you can make all the comparisons you want., but this is not a political party problem. He is an man with low morals also

Big difference is that the Kennedys actually cared about the people that elected them. I guess it is the same thing because the ex-gov did care about the people that elected him - big money

and you gotta lose all respect for a man that makes taxpayers cover the costs when he goes after what he wants

How 'bout that paragon of democratic virtue, Mr Greene?

Oh yes- Mr. Greene, the plant that DeMint set up so he didn't have to worry about getting reelected. People that know Mr. Greene know that there was something to the election being rigged.

Pork and Barrel! Definitely one of the moments he will be remembered for in this state. Or it's at least in the top 5!

How lucky can we get--I do not have to read the Stanley nonsense page of dribble.

one doesn't have to read stanley's, or anyone's, dribble...but if a person reads all messages posted...then you will read stanley's dribble 4X as PATCH system doesn't recognize duplication...OTOH;

some (eg, mainly 19th century white males) should read someone else's dribble other than fox, rush, ann, etal's dribble...

they need to get the 6NOV message...fox, etal's dribble is very much on the wane...65-70% of the minorities (now the majority) said so!

it (fox dribble) waxed bs too long...did much harm to our country...eg, ridiculous tax cuts for the rich, the 2008 recession and the slower recovery from same...

TO: PATCH
the below message submited...got pending comment...pending comment disapeared...message not posted.

the below submitted not posted (no explaination) message:

one doesn't have to read stanley's, or anyone's, dribble...but if a person reads all messages posted...the you will read stanley's dribble 4X as PATCH system doesn't recognize duplication...OTOH;

some (eg, white males) should read someone else's dribble other than fox, rush, ann, etal's dribble...

they need to get the 6NOV message...fox, etal's dribble is very much on the wane...70% of the minorities (now the majority) said so!

it (fox dribble) waxed bs too long...did much harm to our country...eg, ridiculous tax cuts for the rich, the 2008 recession and the slower recovery from same...

TO: PATCH
the below message submited 3X...get pending comment...pending comment disapeared...message not posted.

the submitted not posted (no explaination) message:

one doesn't have to read stanley's, or anyone's, dribble...but if a person reads all messages posted...then you will read stanley's dribble 4X as PATCH system doesn't recognize duplication...OTOH;

some (eg, white males) should read someone else's dribble other than fox, rush, ann, etal's dribble...

they need to get the 6NOV message...fox, etal's dribble is very much on the wane...70% of the minorities (now the majority) said so!

it (fox dribble) waxed bs too long...did much harm to our country...eg, ridiculous tax cuts for the rich, the 2008 recession and the slower recovery from same...

ENOUGH, ALREADY!!!!!!

"Paranoia May Destroy Ya"
Nobody wants to take your right to arms
How about background checks no matter where you buy a gun?

Hey Larry--where are you? Wake up Larry. Everyone is talking about Mark Sanford and you are talking about firearms. I am only replying because I happen to agree with universal background checks in addition to an extreme crackdown on straw purchases. The rest of this gun control crap is just that as the politicians and the media feed off of 20 dead children for their own sick reasons. Stick the resident in the whitehouse into the middle of all this with his pure theatrical tear wipe and his creating a group of childhood dupes who were selected to stand next to the ignorant man.
If you wake up and are still into the Mark Sanford "stuff" he is still the best person to resume his position as our congressman. If you are going to give me the Argentine dance, kindly remember a soiled dress in the Oval Office of the Whitehouse and perjury to boot and now that "fatty" is considered a respected and honored man, even though he was shown to be a dysfunctional deviant and a liar.

Ambassador - I was replying to this post, do know what you are looking at. You remember a whole different Sanford than I do. I remember across the board cuts, pay freezes, job losses and the list goes on.
He is and always was a self-serving a-hole. He has NEVER been for the average person, he was always looking out for his rich buddies.

Ambassador- I guess that makes you a Clinton FANBOY, you keep comparing them and you seem to be in love with one of them, there for - you must be in love with both. Frankly I thought both Clinton and his wife were corrupt as heck. I even wrote him once to tell him not to preach "Family Values" to me.

I don't dislike Sanford for "Hiking The Appalacian Trail". I dislike him for what he did to me and mine on a personal level with all his cuts and freezes.

Your 1/21 reply at least makes sense. Leaving aside all the rhetoric and giving me an honest answer on Sanford. I still think that you and I may be the only people NOT running for this office. What I love is the fact that many of the current politicos are using funds they already have from all their other "races", and literally take it for granted that they will all win. No one will ever convince me that I should ever vote for a dem again--he or she could be the Lord himself but he will never see my vote--the idea that he or she would stand there with Pelosi and her smile just makes me want to puke. The list of repubs is also enough to want me to puke. At least Sanford, whether it hurt your family or not, was truly a skinflint when it came to funding, spending and taxes and his predictions many years ago ring very true today as this country is ready to fall off the bandwagon of greatness thanks to the piece of garbage in the whitehouse.

He may have been right about the looming financial disaster but his approach was totally wrong. You cannot run the government like a business - PEOPLE'S LIVES ARE LITERALLY AT STAKE. The sooner all these politicians realize that the better. You can't just tell people that they need to pull themselves out of poverty and expect that everyone can do it. You can't expect that someone making barely over minimum wage to be able to survive on their own. Part of the problem is that the state will take all assistance (except food stamps in some cases) from a person as soon as they get a job. It doesn't matter if they are making less than they would on welfare, they still lose it not to mention the added cost of child care, and people wonder why anyone would want to stay on welfare. It's simple economics. Sanford was all about cutting everything no matter how many children had to go hungry or go to school in ragged dirty clothes. And let's not forget the children that lost medical coverage. Thank Godness for Obamacare, at least my grandchildren and children will be able to get medical care. On you comment about the person in the whitehouse - You MUST be watching FOX news - The president was done more in his one term than most presidents do in 2. If the PUBS would stop trying to block EVERYTHING then this country would already be back on its feet. I didn't not vote for him the first time but I voted for him this time because he seemed to be the ONLY Washington actually doing something