Politics & Government

Twitter Talk on Possible Conflict Between General Assembly and the Courts

A state representative, the head of a Tea Party group, and the leader of a conservative think tank debate possible solutions to South Carolina's ballot mess.

In a story Monday on Patch, former Gov. Mark Sanford .

Sanford had harsh words for the legislature, with which he often clashed while in office.

But Sanford also suggested that the the relationship between the state legislature and the courts be reviewed. The state Supreme Court, for example, is appointed by members of the legislature at the recommendation of a commission. The legislature also gets its funding by approval of the legislature.

Find out what's happening in Columbiawith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Sanford said this arrangement is set-up to benefit incumbents and that the , while following precedent, had the added benefit of helping the very people who pay the court's salaries.

When the story ran on Monday, State Rep. Leon Stavrinakis (D - 119) took issue with Sanford's implications on Twitter. He was subsequently engaged in discussion by Ashley Landess of the South Carolina Policy Council and Talbert Black, Jr., of the Palmetto Liberty Political Action Commitee.

Find out what's happening in Columbiawith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Landess and Black think that judges should be appointed by the governor, while Stavrinakis isn't convinced that would solve any questions about conflicts of interest.

Their conversation, condensed by Twitter, is above.


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

More from Columbia